[oclug] A new HOWTO

[Michael W. Bazdell]

I do apologize to anybody who took this personally. I would like to
point out that I'm very good natured and mean no disrespect to anybody.
That being said, I did offer a solution in point 3. The purpose for the
e-mail was not to antagonize or declare superiority, merely to show that
these same topics come up far to often, and have no effect every time.
Other than starting debates which lead to nowhere.

Again, please don't take this as a personal attack. I'm just trying to
have a little fun while keeping things in perspective.


On Wed, 2005-07-09 at 08:57 -0400, Bill Strosberg wrote:
> Michael W. Bazdell wrote:
> > 3) Believe that you'll actually change people's mind through a general
> > e-mail instead of talking to the specific individuals who caused the


> > problem.
> Hmm, a response to David that:
> 
> a)	Hints at superiority;
> b)	Fails to suggest any viable course of resolution;
> c)	Manages to antagonize one of our best international Linux success stories
> d)	Alienates one of the longest standing financial supporters of OCLUG
> 
> Michael, unless you are significantly contributing more to the Linux
> community than Roaring Penguin and David personally, I suggest a public
> apology, and then complete silence as a course of action.
> 
> --
> Bill Strosberg
-- 
Michael W. Bazdell <michael at baztech.ca>
http://www.baztech.ca
BazTech Solutions
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://tux.oclug.on.ca/pipermail/oclug/attachments/20050907/fff8bb45/attachment.pgp