[oclug] Why is the GIMP Illegal? (was Governments requesting anticounterfeit...)

Milan Budimirovic milan.budimirovic at sympatico.ca
Mon Jan 12 20:26:50 EST 2004


On Mon, 2004-01-12 at 10:07, Rod Giffin wrote:
> Brian Barber said:
> > Pardon my ignorance, but why would The GIMP be consedered illegal?  Is
> > it because of Unisys' gif patent issue?
> 
> As far as I know, The GIMP isn't illegal anywhere, even in respect of the
> gif LZW patent issue.  You might have to pay UniSys a license fee under
> some circumstances, but that's certainly not the same as being "illegal".
> 
> Also, with respect to this new challenge, the way Photoshop prevents you
> from using an image which is too close to a $20.00 bill is by a fairly
> simple pattern recognition technology.   Something like it can be
> incorporated fairly easily into The GIMP because of it's plugable
> interface.
> 
> I'm not saying this is a good way to stop serious counterfeiters - it's
> not.  But when it's trivial to get a printer capable of printing something
> that looke close enough to paper currency that a lot of people wouldn't
> think twice about taking, you have a problem that needs to be addressed.
> 
> Rod.
> 

Yeah. I think that the Photoshop feature is there just to deter the
amateur counterfeiters, many of whom are kids who probably don't realize
how serious an offense it really is.




More information about the OCLUG mailing list