[oclug]managing permissions with smbfs
Michael P. Soulier
msoulier at digitaltorque.ca
Sat Jan 25 14:51:25 EST 2003
On 25/01/03 Joe Burpee did speaketh:
> There's no executable flag on a FAT fs, so I assume it's not supported
> by Samba either. DOS uses "extensions" (suffixes) like .EXE, etc. You
> can do `mount -t smbfs -o fmask=...' but that's pretty crude.
But that wouldn't work either. That only affects how the files are
displayed when mounted. It still has no effect on the files' permissions on
the server.
I can't be the only one mounting a cgi-bin directory through samba, who
has to ensure that the files are executable.
Mike
--
Michael P. Soulier <msoulier at digitaltorque.ca>, GnuPG pub key: 5BC8BE08
"...the word HACK is used as a verb to indicate a massive amount
of nerd-like effort." -Harley Hahn, A Student's Guide to Unix
HTML Email Considered Harmful: http://expita.com/nomime.html
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://tux.oclug.on.ca/pipermail/oclug/attachments/20030125/3f14222a/attachment.bin
More information about the OCLUG
mailing list