[oclug]glibc version?

Bob Lockie bjlockie at lockie.ca
Wed Jan 22 19:12:42 EST 2003


On 01/21/03 14:47 Shad Young spoke thusly

>If you are running a RPM based box, try "rpm -q glibc"
>
>Modern boxes use > 2.2 but support should be included for backward
>compatibility for earlier version.
>
>Shad
>
>On Tue, 2003-01-21 at 14:36, Bob Lockie wrote:
>  
>
>>On 01/21/03 09:53 Dave Edwards spoke thusly
>>
>>    
>>
>>>On Mon, 2003-01-20 at 23:37, Chris H wrote:
>>> 
>>>
>>>      
>>>
>>>>On January 20, 2003 11:15 pm, Bob Lockie wrote:
>>>>   
>>>>
>>>>        
>>>>
>>>>>My Dad wants something for Linux that is similar to the MS Access database.
>>>>>I could install MySQL for him if there is a GUI client to hide the
>>>>>details from him. :-)
>>>>>Any suggestions?
>>>>>     
>>>>>
>>>>>          
>>>>>
>>>I lost the top of this thread, but nonetheless...
>>>
>>>There is MySQL's own GUI controller, which is in late-beta:
>>>http://www.mysql.com/products/mysqlcc/
>>>
>>>      
>>>
>>I get a compile error when I try to make the source, I am probably 
>>missing some QZT or MySQL header. :-)
>>
>>How to I determine which glibc I have so I can try a pre-compiled binary.
>>
I don't use RedHat.
The choices are for glibc 2.2 or glibc 2.3.
The binary for 2.2 seems to work.



-- 
----------------------------------------
Sent from Mozilla and GNU/Linux.
Powered by an AMD processor.





More information about the OCLUG mailing list