SA False Positive, was Re: [oclug]Non Editable Poster

[Dave Edwards]

On Thu, 2003-01-02 at 09:08, charles.macdonald at hrdc-drhc.gc.ca wrote:
> SPAM: -------------------- Start SpamAssassin results ----------------------
> SPAM: This mail is probably spam.  The original message has been altered
> SPAM: so you can recognise or block similar unwanted mail in future.
> SPAM: See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
> SPAM: 
> SPAM: Content analysis details:   (6.90 hits, 4.5 required)
> SPAM: TO_LOCALPART_EQ_REAL (-0.3 points) To: repeats local-part as real name
> SPAM: INVALID_DATE       (1.5 points)  Invalid Date: header (not RFC 2822)
> SPAM: NO_REAL_NAME       (1.3 points)  From: does not include a real name
> SPAM: SPAM_PHRASE_03_05  (1.1 points)  BODY: Spam phrases score is 03 to 05 (medium)
> SPAM:                    [score: 3]
> SPAM: KNOWN_MAILING_LIST (-0.1 points) Email came from some known mailing list software
> SPAM: FORGED_RCVD_TRAIL  (2.0 points)  trail of Received: headers seems to be forged
> SPAM: DATE_IN_PAST_06_12 (0.4 points)  Date: is 6 to 12 hours before Received: date
> SPAM: PRIORITY_NO_NAME   (1.0 points)  Message has priority setting, but no X-Mailer
> SPAM: 
> SPAM: -------------------- End of SpamAssassin results ---------------------
> 
>

Charles, I thought this might interest you (and maybe HRDC, too)-- I
tracked your note down in my ~/caughtspam file.  I bring it up here to
see if anyone else's installation of spamassassin tagged it.

Dave.
-- 
dle1 at sympatico.ca
The Open Source Weekend
http://www.osw.ca
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 232 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://tux.oclug.on.ca/pipermail/oclug/attachments/20030102/bf86c916/attachment.bin