Ascendant (was Re: [oclug] rocketman)

[Shad Young]

I am not sure what's going on, but it seems my postings are not getting
through... any way, thank you GR.

I have changed it according to Milan's suggestion, and I thanked Milan and
Rod both for their feedback, but I dunno if anybody got them.

Best
Shad

----- Original Message -----
From: "GR Gaudreau" <transop at sympatico.ca>
To: "OCLUG List" <oclug at lists.oclug.on.ca>
Sent: Saturday, October 12, 2002 12:43 PM
Subject: Re: Ascendant (was Re: [oclug] rocketman)


> On Sat, 2002-10-12 at 09:24, Milan Budimirovic wrote:
> > Rod Giffin wrote:
> > >
> > > On Saturday 12 October 2002 01:20 am, Shad Young wrote:
> > > > OK
> > > >
_______________________________________________________________________
> > > >
> > > > Have an article, story or essay you want to publish online? We need
> > > > content. Ascendant: food for the thinking mind.
http://ascendant.obone.ca
> > > >
_______________________________________________________________________
> <snip>
> > > Rod.
> >
> > Not to harp or anything, but perhaps "annalists are dubious" should be
> > replaced with "analysts are sceptical"? The way you worded it, you're
> > calling their character into question and I don't think that's what you
> > intended.
>
> [gr]   Rod is right, it's not the correct use of the word. Sceptical
> would have been the right choice.
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> oclug mailing list
> oclug at lists.oclug.on.ca
> http://www.oclug.on.ca/mailman/listinfo/oclug